Showing posts with label OUan602. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OUan602. Show all posts
Thursday, 19 May 2016
Evaluation
My experience on the course has definitely been an interesting one. I started off on the course wanting to design the most, and this didn't change for the duration of the course. I was at first interested in storyboarding as well but I didn't enjoy it enough to teach myself it along with everything else on the course. I didn't enjoy animating that much but I think that was in part because of the way I learn; I think that a lot more smaller character animation tasks would have gel;per me learn and made me much more interested in animation. Also not having much time to spend on preproduction or many lessons on preproduction made me not enjoy what I was animating - if we spent a lot more time in first year learning basic skills than concentrating on creating finished animations I think that I personally would have carried on. I also found that I did not have time in second year to teach myself how to model/rig along with the rest of our work which is a shame because that would have been a good skill to have with character design. I felt like I was not learning enough design/idea based skills with the course to help me keep my interest, and the more it felt like creating was a chore, the less I wanted to do it. This has helped me realise that I do not want a career in this, and I would rather enjoy and create art for myself with possibly earning a little bit of money on the side for myself instead.
Live Brief Initial Sketches 3
I thought that SWAT gear could potentially be very useful against vampire, adding a tiny bit more shielding. You do have to ask where would the survivors get this from, but we don't yet know what kind of resources etc they have. It would be unlikely I think for multiple characters to have it if any.
I also thought that the 'hillbilly' stereotype could be fun in a game like this, especially as it is often associated with Christianity which is something that plays a large part in vampire mythology.
I ended up going a little more extreme with proportions as I looked into this - these kinds of shapes almost seem like they are there as comedic characters - which they could be, if there was a larger cast of characters in this game. I think that these designs could be a little to exaggerated though, as the game itself sounds fairly serious.
Life Brief Initial Sketches 2
I like the idea of having some kind of priest in this setting because they are perfect against vampires, although I don't know how much it would affect the characters in the game. Trying to design characters with limited detail was hard to do partially because I don't quite know how the models will come out - I know that they are low-poly, but I'm not sure how the texturing will be working and quite how low poly they will be.
I started drawing a little more stylised because not only am I a lot faster at it but I think it would actually work out better; using simpler shapes would be better for the modelers since they only have so much to work with on low poly models.
Live Brief Initial Sketches
I started off sketching some bits and pieces from the notes that I made last time since both the environments and potentially characters may use these props.
I also quickly sketched down some of the things that happen to shops etc. in riots that might make up a fair bit of the environments in this world. It felt very weird starting off with backgrounds/environment design rather than characters, so I thought that I would switch back over for a while to help me get into the project.
The brief put a lot of emphasis on exploration, so I decided to get some characters down without worrying about them too much; thinking about the stereotypes/occupations first can make it easier to the figure out how to make these things fit in this world.
At this point it was still unclear whether or not there would only be one character and how much they may be involved with the story, or if they were mostly there for gameplay. This meant that I still had time to look at a lot of different character types without worrying about their place in the world. I wanted to make sure that I still got some ideas down for stereotypical characters like the 'tough guy' as above, because they are generally very popular characters.
Live Brief
I have included my main brief as a file for submission, but I won't be posting it as it is still part of a project undergoing development. I can however post my initial sketches etc so far.
Due to the nature of the brief and the stage in which the project is in, I will not have a finished piece before the deadline, but I will have initial ideas and some development to show.
For the exterior environments I am looking into riots as they often come hand in hand with supernatural rise ups. The state of the environment may depend on the type of vampires; plenty of media include vampires who would work like humans to get things back into pristine condition, but there are also some that thrive on violence and terrorising humans so both ideas would be worth looking into. I also asked about the location/architecture but so far the only decision is that it is based in somewhere like the UK or US.
I accepted this brief because it was fairly open, and gives me the opportunity to experiment a lot more with both environments and characters. I can focus predominantly with ideas instead of working towards something fully completed, which works well for me. As the project progresses I would likely be creating turnarounds for the 3D modelers as well as possible diagrams of environments which will work well in my portfolio.
Due to the nature of the brief and the stage in which the project is in, I will not have a finished piece before the deadline, but I will have initial ideas and some development to show.
For the exterior environments I am looking into riots as they often come hand in hand with supernatural rise ups. The state of the environment may depend on the type of vampires; plenty of media include vampires who would work like humans to get things back into pristine condition, but there are also some that thrive on violence and terrorising humans so both ideas would be worth looking into. I also asked about the location/architecture but so far the only decision is that it is based in somewhere like the UK or US.
Notes;
garlic
crosses (made of rowan?)
iron
holy water
mirrors
open windows - letting light through in case a vampire can invade
ringing bells
features of a safe house
not necessarily clean or used all that often
does not need to be spacious
function > form
may have been abandoned before
in the middle of nowhere?
stockpile; food, weaponry, bandages shelter etc - may need to stay a while
Injuries, war wounds? What may you do to protect yourself? Do chars have a tan b/c they go out into the sunlight so often to hide from vamps, do very many of the characters wear crosses, do some of the more eccentric ones wear garlic?
Sketches
Recently I've been doing some gesture drawing and anatomy practice to try to learn to draw both more loose and more accurately (not necessarily at the same time, although that would be nice!)
I tend to have a lot of trouble drawings shoulders/arms, so that has been something that I've been concentrating on recently.
Volunteering
I am looking into volunteering at galleries etc as I'm still unsure how involved I want to be with the practical side of art when I leave college, but working with/near art would still be very fun. Since I am intending to work part time anyway I should be able to manage volunteering every so often and this could even help me with networking.
Notes;
JOBS & OPPORTUNITIES
Castlefield Gallery doesn’t currently have any paid job opportunities, however we have a dedicated team of gallery volunteers and we are always interested to hear from people who are looking to gain volunteer experience in a professional gallery environment.
We currently have opportunities for Volunteer Photographers and Volunteer Gallery Assistants:
Volunteer Gallery Assistants at Castlefield Gallery can get involved and gain experience in; marketing & social media, gallery administration, event coordination, exhibition installation and art handling, front of house and visitor services, plus much more. Volunteering at Castlefield Gallery is valuable for both those wanting to develop a career in curation, gallery administration & management, as well as anyone wanting to develop their own artistic practice.
Requirements CG needs volunteer gallery assistants who are personable, hard working, punctual and reliable.
You should be available to volunteer for at least 1 day per month (6.5 hours) for a minimum of three months. However for volunteers to get the best experience 3-4 days per month over a longer period of time is recommended. As all of the staff at Castlefield Gallery are part time we do not offer work experience placements.
Payment Unfortunately we are unable to offer payment. We can however reimburse basic travel expenses and lunch.
Apply Anyone interested should email Matthew Pendergast, Programme Manager on matthew@castlefieldgallery.co.uk. Please include a short statement outlining how volunteering at Castlefield Gallery will help you in your career goals and attach your CV. Matthew will get back to all successful applicants as soon as possible and invite you for an induction at the gallery.
- See more at: http://www.castlefieldgallery.co.uk/about/jobs-opportunities/#sthash.KmrenHHN.dpuf
Manchester Art Gallery and the Gallery of Costume - volunteer roles include delivering tours, facilitate discussion sessions, support artists to deliver our workshop program and help out behind the scenes through research, cataloging and conservation work.
- Find more - Bury, Oldham, Rochdale
Thought Bubble 2015: Writers' Roundtable(2/2)
MB - no formulaic way to break into comics. "Kelly Sue DeConnick - get your worst comics out of the way now so you're ready sooner". MB - Digital webcomics/building a fan base/awareness is very good for practice and meeting people. Fawkes - against more established comics' way of doing it. Less bias of people - i.e straight white males was most likely. If they know here's an audience for this person's books, hen more likely to hire. Kurtis didn't set out to be a girl power book, just wrote the characters. Thought it would fail horribly. Thought 'fantasy setting by two dudes' would receive eye rolls. No amount of marketing etc could do what the fans do - tumblr, cosplay, getting attention that way.
Emi - patreon with reader support. A lot of stress but feels good to know people will support her but now has to put out work - more pressure. Has less time to do stuff with her own Plutona book now though. Charles - more diverse and niche markets b/c internet etc really helps. Will continue 'flowering of cool comics' in M/DC and creator owned comics. MB - new blood - stronger and better ---> how will tech change industry? Fawkes - large comp - telling stories over and over won't work so more diverse titles out there, more individual voices + higher reader responses.
Emi - excited - plutona ignored 15 years ago. Everyone accepting and excited for new comics, more and more art style out there. Kurtis - digital landscape open things up a lot. Webcomics grew but hard to break in - now easier to find and read online. Instagram etc makes everything much more interactive. Fawkes - wide range of things comics can do that TV etc can't and comics can still be more widely explored yet. Emi - think in pictures. Kurtis - love collaborative spirit of i, another creative person takes it and makes it better. MB - form follows function - stories diminished in other forms of media. Charles - amazing seeing it done a few months later. Likes breaking story a lot - public place let ideas come, caught in flow of the place. MB - not a gig in which you get rich. Fawkes - thank god romance comics brought back. Sci-fi re surge recently, love to see more horror. Uzumaki tricks only work in comics.
Thought Bubble 2015: Writers' Roundtable (1/2)
Charles, Marguerite Bennett, Ray Fawkes, Emi Lennox, Kurtis Weibe
Who do you write for? Charles - write for myself - challenge self, say something about who he is. MG - catharsis, discover feelings/opinions etc. Fawkes - driving force that he can't identify. Hope his writing will connect, writes stuff mostly for himself. Kurtis - is there's something that he wants to read that isn't out there, he wants to write it. Women aren't well represented in fantasy, so wanted to do something outside the paradigm. MB - never a time while working in comics that social media didn't effect who she spoke to etc. - found people on twitter (from mad max fanart) to work on bombshells with. Social media - both good and bad. MM - 2 dif writers in comics - just put it out there, or 'stand in front and shout about it'.
Charles - like twitter, easy to write something wrong in 140 characters - career could be completely over from it. Good as an outreach tool rather than for interaction. Twitter lets put self out there in a way that feels relatable, but also letting work speak for self. Kurtis - set up 15 issues of Rat Queen - change a lot after fans so invested a lot of cosplay - don't want to mess with those most popular characters. Marvel/DC fans - can be nasty or supportive but better with creator owned comics - less intimidating. Charles - in a way, M/DC 'handing out pellets' - doing what the fans want? Emi - dif sort of audience from rest of panel - writes about life so doesn't take influence from readers/audience. Writing for self, documenting life so being honest, worried about being judged from auto-bio comic, with social media but 'gotta do what you gotta do'. Take most popular chars from comics - how to plot a course from what they're expecting.
Charles - killed Wolverine - so many ways the story could have been wrong. Needed to tell a story based on what he felt was right. His biggest book by far. Hoping fans would say he did it right. Fawkes - many fans liked the book but treated it like a puzzle - how is he coming back? Kurtis - came into comics a lot later on. Warren Ellis was one of his biggest influences. Emi - influenced by Craig Thompson. Fawkes - Alan Moore's superhero books made him want to write comics. Was a writer before a comic writer. Mentorwise - learned loads by working with a mentor. Margueritte - Scott Snyder was her professor - wanted to be a writer/comics writer. They kept in touch and he reach out and asked about writing a comic together before writing on own. Brian Michael Bendis message board had a lot of writers talking including BMB popping in himself and talking. 'Pluona' series Jeff Lemire - been a friend for a while - wanted to help her write stuff, not just auto-bio which is what she wanted.
Who do you write for? Charles - write for myself - challenge self, say something about who he is. MG - catharsis, discover feelings/opinions etc. Fawkes - driving force that he can't identify. Hope his writing will connect, writes stuff mostly for himself. Kurtis - is there's something that he wants to read that isn't out there, he wants to write it. Women aren't well represented in fantasy, so wanted to do something outside the paradigm. MB - never a time while working in comics that social media didn't effect who she spoke to etc. - found people on twitter (from mad max fanart) to work on bombshells with. Social media - both good and bad. MM - 2 dif writers in comics - just put it out there, or 'stand in front and shout about it'.
Charles - like twitter, easy to write something wrong in 140 characters - career could be completely over from it. Good as an outreach tool rather than for interaction. Twitter lets put self out there in a way that feels relatable, but also letting work speak for self. Kurtis - set up 15 issues of Rat Queen - change a lot after fans so invested a lot of cosplay - don't want to mess with those most popular characters. Marvel/DC fans - can be nasty or supportive but better with creator owned comics - less intimidating. Charles - in a way, M/DC 'handing out pellets' - doing what the fans want? Emi - dif sort of audience from rest of panel - writes about life so doesn't take influence from readers/audience. Writing for self, documenting life so being honest, worried about being judged from auto-bio comic, with social media but 'gotta do what you gotta do'. Take most popular chars from comics - how to plot a course from what they're expecting.
Charles - killed Wolverine - so many ways the story could have been wrong. Needed to tell a story based on what he felt was right. His biggest book by far. Hoping fans would say he did it right. Fawkes - many fans liked the book but treated it like a puzzle - how is he coming back? Kurtis - came into comics a lot later on. Warren Ellis was one of his biggest influences. Emi - influenced by Craig Thompson. Fawkes - Alan Moore's superhero books made him want to write comics. Was a writer before a comic writer. Mentorwise - learned loads by working with a mentor. Margueritte - Scott Snyder was her professor - wanted to be a writer/comics writer. They kept in touch and he reach out and asked about writing a comic together before writing on own. Brian Michael Bendis message board had a lot of writers talking including BMB popping in himself and talking. 'Pluona' series Jeff Lemire - been a friend for a while - wanted to help her write stuff, not just auto-bio which is what she wanted.
Thought Bubble 2015: Creator Owned Comics
Sean Murphy, Matt Schol, Was Craig, Bengal, Jerome, Remender
Most on panel left jobs that pay more than comics b/c excitement of ideas, working with friends etc. Bengal - almost every comic in France is creator owned. Less rewarding there - harder to stand out. Wes worked in games, but just wanted to do comic books. Nice for name on cover, a real personal statement. Matt - less big studios in Italy - a lot of schools of comics - waiter etc while working on own stuff. Never had to pick between comics/anything better. Done some small anim concept stuff. Marvel = constant work, was asked by image to do comics instead. Murphy DC for 7 years - didn't 'fit in', did some Vertigo and some at Image with Remender too. Rememender - inspired by TMNT etc, realised 'oh, anyone can do this' and followed Robert Williams to Zapp comics.
Wrote own comics when very young. Jerome - 6 - Indonesia for a year, started to read comics. Made him want to make them.. Craig - French translations of American comics, B+T. Sort of started with Akira, Teen Titans. Teen Titans turned him into a collector but Eisner's Spirit made him want to do comics. Matt - started with American comics, Italian and manga at the same time. Parents didn't want him to read a lot. Anime Saint Seiya got him wanting to draw as well as Fist of the Northstar and Dragonball. Murphy - Chris Ware, Karl Baker, not gavitating to superhero comics but saw some B+W - tried to so smilar with m/DC style to pay the bills. Remender saw Murphy's Hellblazer comics and asked him to do a creator owned one - initially said no. Remender and Murphy wanted to do a book together, took 3 months of throwing ideas around. Probs a year after taking elements they liked and giving life to. Was 4 1 book b/c style and interests work for plot. Matteo for worlds and things coming together seamlessly. Remender - very little time to read other stuff etc. Looked at some when Matteo - working sometimes 18 hours a day before so couldn't read others, now has free weekends to read books - work is better for not constantly worrying 'what am I doing next?' Murphy - not always a burned bridge when swapping from dc/marvel to creator owned.
Most on panel left jobs that pay more than comics b/c excitement of ideas, working with friends etc. Bengal - almost every comic in France is creator owned. Less rewarding there - harder to stand out. Wes worked in games, but just wanted to do comic books. Nice for name on cover, a real personal statement. Matt - less big studios in Italy - a lot of schools of comics - waiter etc while working on own stuff. Never had to pick between comics/anything better. Done some small anim concept stuff. Marvel = constant work, was asked by image to do comics instead. Murphy DC for 7 years - didn't 'fit in', did some Vertigo and some at Image with Remender too. Rememender - inspired by TMNT etc, realised 'oh, anyone can do this' and followed Robert Williams to Zapp comics.
Wrote own comics when very young. Jerome - 6 - Indonesia for a year, started to read comics. Made him want to make them.. Craig - French translations of American comics, B+T. Sort of started with Akira, Teen Titans. Teen Titans turned him into a collector but Eisner's Spirit made him want to do comics. Matt - started with American comics, Italian and manga at the same time. Parents didn't want him to read a lot. Anime Saint Seiya got him wanting to draw as well as Fist of the Northstar and Dragonball. Murphy - Chris Ware, Karl Baker, not gavitating to superhero comics but saw some B+W - tried to so smilar with m/DC style to pay the bills. Remender saw Murphy's Hellblazer comics and asked him to do a creator owned one - initially said no. Remender and Murphy wanted to do a book together, took 3 months of throwing ideas around. Probs a year after taking elements they liked and giving life to. Was 4 1 book b/c style and interests work for plot. Matteo for worlds and things coming together seamlessly. Remender - very little time to read other stuff etc. Looked at some when Matteo - working sometimes 18 hours a day before so couldn't read others, now has free weekends to read books - work is better for not constantly worrying 'what am I doing next?' Murphy - not always a burned bridge when swapping from dc/marvel to creator owned.
Thought Bubble 2015: Sketching Spotlight
Doug Braithwaite, Wes Craig, Isabel Greenberg, and Amy Reeder.
Isabel - doesn't typically have a commercial style, usually gets narrative-based illustrative jobs - much less effort in work only for money than stuff loved. Doug - absorb into life like drawing if you want to be a good artist, no longer any time to. DCA - hard to fill up SB - hard to find the time, airports etc easier to draw random people. Also aren't always inspired. MG - Hard to figure out what to draw/do once started, easier to find stuff to do with comics, learn to draw what the comic calls for. DCA Good once in a while to go back to studying/try something new, contributes ideas to stories if he has any that writer can add to script. Final script after art work. DB - read the script a few times, plays through head like a film, starts jotting down little panel compositions in margins then layout the pages.
2x3" atm then blow thumbs up. Can get composition right at that size.
MG - Hard time coming up with stuff, es to public places for ides - curiosity of people is motivating, keeps on topic. Only draw something right once. Draws images for separate panels first before actual panels, and figures out the panel shapes afterwards. Blows up thumbnails and prints bigger. Hand-draws everything. DB - comps a lot more now for adjusting layouts. MG - comp nice, edit endlessly + make it disappear. Colours + letters digitally. Wesley - paper. Roughs by hand - 4 thumbs per page of paper, print on blue line, bristol board, photoshop adjustments. Doesn't like drawing on glass (tablet), prefers the feel of paper.
DB - paint greyscale (time constraints) - nice compromise, more colour in photoshop + overlays. Bought old canvasses, don't end up using them. Wes - knows it's way faster to comp but ideas come faster when writing by hand. Could draw digital more if could swivel it like paper. DB - think people should learn more traditional art, use digital as a tool - learn better otherwise. MG - see big picture and be loose first - too much concentration on detail b/c so much zooming in/out. Digital looks too 'floaty' because of stroke, undo, stroke, undo.
Wes - being comic art was more feasible than becoming an astronaut etc. Kept drawing, thought being a comic artist was probably not going to happen. Skills good enough that maybe he could do it. Isabel - was always going to be art. Can't make a living with illustration graphics, well, you kind of can. Happened slowly with making small comics & getting a book deal. Never made comics before - got into them because it's like stories + drawings. Doesn't do comics for the sake of being a comic artist.
MG - graduated college, comics weren't on radar at all. Got into manga, found a USA contest manga book. Never considered being an artist. If I treated this like school, could I learn? Made it into a contest book. Desire to tell stories. Minimum amount of people messing with you ideas. Wes fave comics are from only one person making them (rather than a team). MG - doesn't like collaborators and editors etc. - likes more control. MG - if you're having trouble, sketch as loose as possible. Make happy mistakes. DB - spontaneity - flow, movement. Wes - drawings where too much attention is paid to one things isn't good and doesn't look focused enough. MG - hard pencil with a very small point. Shalvey - small layout easier to see whole picture - not deal with details. If comp doesn't work when super tiny, it doesn't work when bigger. Shalvey, life drawing - don't worry about what you're doing. Dif purposes to dif types of drawings. Wes - drawn from real life and work out kinks themselves. DB - find out who your influence's influences are. Look at everything for influences - pre-raphaelites, impressionists. Even stuff you dismiss as rubbish - still stuff left to learn from them. Develop own personal style, try not to replicate. That's how to grab editors' and readers' attention.
Wes does some writing on the side but art takes so much longer. Doesn't work on too much to keep ideas fresh - save money to take time out to do own comics. DB - some writers let him pace stories and panels how he wants. Sees self more as a storyteller than an artist. MG - goal to write and draw all own stuff - 'my art, more than just the pencils - story continued in colours and letters, synergy when everything's all coming from one brain. Write for self - immediately can make something more unusual or not. Wes - play to strengths make images better work - writer might mean you're not playing to your strengths - but on own, might mostly know what's comfortable. MG - scripts often add too much , not enough to space to draw from. loves a lot of direction on the characters feelings + expressions. Anime and Norman Rockwell Influences.
Wes does some writing on the side but art takes so much longer. Doesn't work on too much to keep ideas fresh - save money to take time out to do own comics. DB - some writers let him pace stories and panels how he wants. Sees self more as a storyteller than an artist. MG - goal to write and draw all own stuff - 'my art, more than just the pencils - story continued in colours and letters, synergy when everything's all coming from one brain. Write for self - immediately can make something more unusual or not. Wes - play to strengths make images better work - writer might mean you're not playing to your strengths - but on own, might mostly know what's comfortable. MG - scripts often add too much , not enough to space to draw from. loves a lot of direction on the characters feelings + expressions. Anime and Norman Rockwell Influences.
Thought Bubble 2015 Decompressed
WORLDBUILDING
Kate Leth, Kieron Gillen, Noelle Stevenson, Rick Remender, Scott Snyder
Leth - did not intend to be a writer. wrote very few comics before asked to do an adventure time comic. Taking someone else's sandbox and building on it - she originated with fanfiction. Remender - subconsciously building on things that we could subconsciously be dealing with in the future. Why build a world? Rem - tricky with marvel, can't change world. boundaries already. LR/EW process feels dead if not working for fun. Nimona - jobs that fit based off her personal work. If you're telling a story in an established world, still some world building sometimes? People like to live in lots of dif worlds. Snyder - suffusing world with everything you're passionate about. Creator owned - inherently your own - need to convince people it's accessible, can create a world that is a projection on how you feel in a certain place or situation. Make the audience care! Build worlds because it's fun. Emotional Resonance. What connects your own thing with everyone else? 3rd year of writing, only just feel like beginning to be a writer. Rem - find something you can put yourself into. Gillen - place as a character. Nimona - playful tone but still sets up for a darker tone. Noelle - read a lot as a kid. Made a lot of stories but didn't know where they were going?
Nimona - knew the ending immediately, started as generic superhero story last moment changing to knights etc ----> world developed from that. Didn't spend a lot of sketching out - some chars designed on the panel in finalised drawing. Not all of it had so much thinking but knew the tone of the story, knew where it was going. Last minute changes allowed with a webcomic - less so with an editor. Leth - a lot is improvised. In other worlds, knew how it had to end. Power up - these or chars we want to explore. Not necessarily an ending. Will have 2 hour talks about their apartment, workplace etc - tells you so much about what a char is about. Gillen - done so well in video games. Leth - Gone Home - taught to pay attention. Snyder - chars conduits for him to explore himself. - as long as know the end game, he's good to go. General map = exploratory throughout the rest. Al - wanted to go all over the place at first. Likes to do prep and very tight outline - gladly deviate from it if it feels right. Explore how we create monsters in our head through gender, race etc. Likes not being precise if it doesn't surprise you, it doesn't surprise anyone else.
Remender - no right or wrong way to do it. Do want to have an outline and know where you're going. At one point rewrote loads and had a checklist - the thing would be perfect - then has to write it for a year - takes the jout out of it. Second guess or get bored it. Idea can live with me for so long that they get bored of it. Still structure, intention, beats, landmarks, pre-planning beginning, middle and end - can see what needs to be cut. Black science 12 issues was cut to 6 issues. Save the Cat structure - a lot of films based on it (based on Ripley saves the cat (name sake) Gillen - like if every song in the world using the same beat - boring and predictable. Remender - survey where people enjoyed not having an unpredictable ending ----> can make people enjoy it less, want what they are comfortable wih.
Leth - why Saga works - you know where this is going; "someone I love is going to die". Ewing - BkV - writing in 5 act sructure instead - why it works so well? Unlikable chars are good - stretch our perceived limits of our empathy. Leth - get mad if you kind of empathise with them. Snyder - it's suffocating knowing/using a structure but start using your own and start making it about something important to you. Making sure the story takes you somewhere emotionally. Chars can surprise you and take you to places that you don't want to go in. Emotional authenticity > well built plot.
Gillen - most people think contrived D&D when worldbuilding is mentioned - worldbuilding is actually a tool, not an end product. Would rather read smething that takes risks etc. Filling - story is a mirror and when everything else falls off, you're staring at yourself. Love to see more worldbulding more worlds that we wants than worlds than we fear. Potential in 'This is how the world could be'/ Noelle - darker worlds allow that element of Hope
Kate Leth, Kieron Gillen, Noelle Stevenson, Rick Remender, Scott Snyder
Leth - did not intend to be a writer. wrote very few comics before asked to do an adventure time comic. Taking someone else's sandbox and building on it - she originated with fanfiction. Remender - subconsciously building on things that we could subconsciously be dealing with in the future. Why build a world? Rem - tricky with marvel, can't change world. boundaries already. LR/EW process feels dead if not working for fun. Nimona - jobs that fit based off her personal work. If you're telling a story in an established world, still some world building sometimes? People like to live in lots of dif worlds. Snyder - suffusing world with everything you're passionate about. Creator owned - inherently your own - need to convince people it's accessible, can create a world that is a projection on how you feel in a certain place or situation. Make the audience care! Build worlds because it's fun. Emotional Resonance. What connects your own thing with everyone else? 3rd year of writing, only just feel like beginning to be a writer. Rem - find something you can put yourself into. Gillen - place as a character. Nimona - playful tone but still sets up for a darker tone. Noelle - read a lot as a kid. Made a lot of stories but didn't know where they were going?
Nimona - knew the ending immediately, started as generic superhero story last moment changing to knights etc ----> world developed from that. Didn't spend a lot of sketching out - some chars designed on the panel in finalised drawing. Not all of it had so much thinking but knew the tone of the story, knew where it was going. Last minute changes allowed with a webcomic - less so with an editor. Leth - a lot is improvised. In other worlds, knew how it had to end. Power up - these or chars we want to explore. Not necessarily an ending. Will have 2 hour talks about their apartment, workplace etc - tells you so much about what a char is about. Gillen - done so well in video games. Leth - Gone Home - taught to pay attention. Snyder - chars conduits for him to explore himself. - as long as know the end game, he's good to go. General map = exploratory throughout the rest. Al - wanted to go all over the place at first. Likes to do prep and very tight outline - gladly deviate from it if it feels right. Explore how we create monsters in our head through gender, race etc. Likes not being precise if it doesn't surprise you, it doesn't surprise anyone else.
Remender - no right or wrong way to do it. Do want to have an outline and know where you're going. At one point rewrote loads and had a checklist - the thing would be perfect - then has to write it for a year - takes the jout out of it. Second guess or get bored it. Idea can live with me for so long that they get bored of it. Still structure, intention, beats, landmarks, pre-planning beginning, middle and end - can see what needs to be cut. Black science 12 issues was cut to 6 issues. Save the Cat structure - a lot of films based on it (based on Ripley saves the cat (name sake) Gillen - like if every song in the world using the same beat - boring and predictable. Remender - survey where people enjoyed not having an unpredictable ending ----> can make people enjoy it less, want what they are comfortable wih.
Leth - why Saga works - you know where this is going; "someone I love is going to die". Ewing - BkV - writing in 5 act sructure instead - why it works so well? Unlikable chars are good - stretch our perceived limits of our empathy. Leth - get mad if you kind of empathise with them. Snyder - it's suffocating knowing/using a structure but start using your own and start making it about something important to you. Making sure the story takes you somewhere emotionally. Chars can surprise you and take you to places that you don't want to go in. Emotional authenticity > well built plot.
Gillen - most people think contrived D&D when worldbuilding is mentioned - worldbuilding is actually a tool, not an end product. Would rather read smething that takes risks etc. Filling - story is a mirror and when everything else falls off, you're staring at yourself. Love to see more worldbulding more worlds that we wants than worlds than we fear. Potential in 'This is how the world could be'/ Noelle - darker worlds allow that element of Hope
Flower Bookmarks
I have been commissioned to make a few simple floral bookmarks, so I thought that I would have a little bit of fun with it and use Brusho inks. I think that they stop the bookmarks from looking too graphicy which doesn't always go with flowers, but I like the effect that it does have. This was extremely open and vague, but the client was already happy enough with the few initial ideas that I created. It would be interesting to think a little bit more about bookmarks since that isn't something I've ever really thought about making but could be good for a little more illustrationy practice.
Book Layout
I am creating a book of my development work for extended for the exhibition, so I have been thinking about my earlier research of art books. I came to the conclusion that I want to keep the layout as simple as possible in this case, as some of my ideas have a lot of small design, and most of it is just that, ideas, so it doesn't need to be overly fancy or anything. I will use different colours for different sections but here are a few simple example of the pages
Wednesday, 18 May 2016
Art Book Layout 5
One Punch Man fits a lot of information on one page to demonstrate the different outfits, angles and expressions for the anime. There is a lot of tiny annotations to talk about individual parts of the designs rather than a wall of test which makes the page a lot more interesting. Despite being similar colour to the main character's design, the page borders don't really take attention away from the designs - possibly because there are so many anyway but I think it helps that this isn't the kind of huge main character that demands attention - in fact, it may work for the character if he did blend a little into the background considering the context of him in the show.
Space Dandy has mostly line art which is separated into different boxes, making it seem a little less busy than it is. Again, there are some tiny annotations but the bulk of the text is in a box to the right. Using colour that isn't on the character and white text makes this much more interesting than just your standard black text wall. It also acts like a nice border and splits up the text and visuals allowing you to concentrate on each separately. The coloured box allows us to see the character's silhouette in white which keeps the page balanced - a black silhouette may stand out too much considering the fact that everything is lined in black, rather than coloured in black.
Different accessories and part of the outfit are separated again here to explain the smaller parts of the design. It also uses a dark background to make the character's lighter pastel colours stand out more. The borders are very faint but keep the page feeling neat and well put together. Parts of the text are highlighted in red to make it look more interesting.
What techniques I use will depend on what I show on the page, but I feel as though I now have a better understanding of how certain layouts complement certain designs and what to do to keep the page looking interesting.
Art Book Layout 3
ATLUS'S Persona Art Books are some of the most interesting and informative that I have seen. As Persona is very heavily character based, a lot of thought goes into every part of their outfit, Persona, and fighting style. Persona is predominantly 2D so a lot of attention is put on creating crisp, finished designs. A lot of annotation is used to demonstrate exactly how things work as there is a lot of fighting involved and not using 3D models makes it harder to animate without knowing the specifics.
The layout of the page is simple, but uses a few of the character's specific colours to make it a little more interesting and make everything feel more connected.
The attention to detail can really be seen when looking at their fighting moves - everything is carefully storyboarded and planned out to make sure that it is perfect for the character in question, and the boxes and sections used help to separate the images and make them easier to understand. I will not be going into this much detail because of the nature of my work, but this is a great example or a clear precise way of explaining a character's design and movement.
Art Book Layout 2
Borderlands 2 Shows some of the design stages before it is taken into 3D and rendered out. This does not apply to any of my projects but it is interesting to see exactly how a design started out compared to how it looks 100% finished. A lot of the sketches are in B&W to show values again, making sure that they are readable even without colour. The page clearly shows the game and the character's name without taking up too much space or distracting the viewer.
Borderlands has numbered and different images and used arrows to give the audience a clear understanding of the order in which these assets were created.
Fire Emblem Art Book shows a lot of the possible head and face designs that characters have. This is very important since a lot of Fire Emblem's art is 2D as it uses a visual novel style of storytelling for a great deal of the game - it is mostly the top half of the characters that get seen, so those are the most important parts. The layout of the page is minimal, because Fire Emblem has so much tiny detail in it's designs which may be ignore if the page has other things going on with it.
Art Book Layout 1
I've been looking into the design or Art Books recently - not only could it help me to create a book of development work for the exhibition but it could also help me in the layout of my portfolio. I need to keep it simple and keep the focus on my designs but I want the page to look a lot more interesting than last year. I have been looking at both game and animation art books, Western and Eastern to see what kind of layouts work and different ways of presentation.
Bioshock Infinite uses different page layouts depending on the contents of the page. In the first image, there is a lot of colour and value exploration - using grey backgrounds help to make some of the colours stand out, especially the white shirt that Elizabeth wears. As backgrounds are not always white/of the lightest value, the neutral gray helps emulate the natural environment. The second image shows images of various sizes as they went through the development stages, putting more emphasis on the later ideas that made it into the game. This makes the page easy to read as larger images tend to be the most important ones, letting the readers know the order and end result of this design process.
As the culture of each different place in Dragon Age is so important, so is the fashion. Separated images of each part of the outfit help to make it more understandable, and is also useful for the cosplay community, as a lot of effort goes into Dragon Age cosplays. The purple borders help to bring your attention further in, towards the center of the page while also allowing the further out elements such as the gloves stand out, rather than getting lost at the edges of the page. The text is limited, but gives the reader a good enough understanding of the important elements that make up this dress and the context that it would be seen in.
Wednesday, 27 April 2016
Christian Ward
Christian Ward is another artist who creates illustrations for comics that stands out well.
His work often involve different patterns, shapes and textures that aren't seen that often around comics. Defined black lines and bright colours set the atmosphere well it make the pieces even more interesting.
He also has a very good sense of composition to help lead the viewer's eye exactly where it is intended to go. Negative space is important in a lot of his work, helping to define the busier parts of the image and avoid distracting from the designs, patterns and colours. This kind of thinking outside the box is something that I could definitely work on.
His work often involve different patterns, shapes and textures that aren't seen that often around comics. Defined black lines and bright colours set the atmosphere well it make the pieces even more interesting.
He also has a very good sense of composition to help lead the viewer's eye exactly where it is intended to go. Negative space is important in a lot of his work, helping to define the busier parts of the image and avoid distracting from the designs, patterns and colours. This kind of thinking outside the box is something that I could definitely work on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)