BAF 2013 - Bradford Animation Festival

BAF 2013 was a very fun experience for me, and the first animation festival I've been to. It was good to see all sorts of different types of techniques and ideas, a lot of which I haven't really looked into before. It helped to change my opinion on some kinds of animation, and helped to give me ideas for my own future animations.

Dave McKean - Sandman

One thing I noticed at the festival was that I much preferred the student films over the professional ones.  I don't know if it's just that the professional ones broached weirder subjects, or normal subjects in weird ways that I'm not too keen on, whereas the student ones seemed more entertaining with the more upbeat and colourful kind of styles that I prefer.
On the first day we went, I didn't enjoy as many of that films as I liked, with most of them being as weird as above, but I did enjoy the talks - it was interesting to see the links to animation that illustrator Dave McKean had which was fun because a lot of his work includes covers for comics, something that I'm very interested in as both a viewer and student. Though his style wasn't the usual thing I look it, it was good to see where a lot of his ideas came from.



Lee Hardcastle's talk was one I wasn't looking too forwards to seeing, just because I find both clay and puppets boring, and with his work concentrating on claymation, I didn't think I would enjoy it or that it would be relevant to me at all. I was pleasantly surprised when watching his animations that I enjoyed them so much - mostly from the comedy aspect of it, but it showed how even an animation that has less regard for style can have an audience, and that it could be something to try out in my own time, if I felt like it. I still wouldn't consider clay as something I would want to work with professionally, but I feel less against trying than I did before.

The second day was more fun with the talk from Double Negative, who did a lot of special effects on films that I love. I considered looking at special effects courses a while ago, but I know nothing about, well, anything to do with it, and I wouldn't even know where to start. It was good to get an insight into the industry and the process, and now I notice the small things more often that would have been put into films this way. The films they talked about to us was Rush, about a huge crash in Formula 1 racing. I was surprised to see how much went into this - into their other films like Thor or Harry Potter, I would expect a lot of different things to be put into it, but for something that looks so ordinary, it is crazy.

Rabbit and Deer

The rest of the animations for the day were great as well - there were a lot more 2D upbeat ones which is much more to my taste. Rabbit and Deer was a great show of mixed media and I really enjoyed watching that - it is something I would definitely rewatch, or keep an eye out for more of. Three Grandmas was also enjoyable, and something I wouldn't mind looking up again. The Random Acts section of the day was alright - it was interesting to see what people can fit into 3 minutes of animation but again the styles weren't my sort of thing, and that did make me a lot less interested in it.

Tram - Michaela Pavlatova

The third and last day we went was fun as well - possibly more fun than the second; there were more separate things I enjoyed, but the Double Negative talk was the most interesting and well structured segment there and I'm not sure if anything could have beat that. Michaela Pavlatova's work was interesting and entertaining to watch, especially with the expressions but a lot of her earlier work that ignored backgrounds wasn't as interesting to me. I did like her commentary on how she had more motivation for work when she was unhappier, and being happy gave her less inspiration - you can see how that is relevant in a lot of peoples' work.

Frankenweenie

MacKinnon and Saunders had a very fun talk - again, I wasn't sure at first because something about puppets just tends to annoy me, except for much of Tim Burton's films. With all of the puppets that the company made for his films and how closely they work with him, that made me a lot more interested in it. It was cool to see how many different parts go into it and how many different jobs there are in the company. I never realised that they were located so close to me as well, in Altringham - I would definitely consider work experience there if I had any interest in using puppets for animation, but it still isn't anything I would be interested enough in to try.
After that we watched Frankenweenie which uses their puppets, and it was a great film that I really enjoyed

I enjoyed the festival a lot, and will be so excited to go again next year. I've learned a lot about animation and to be more open about types of and ideas around it. I definitely have a lot more artists and animators to be following now!

Loki - New Comic Book Character Design

MCU Loki

Loki of Marvel fame has recently got  new redesign... by no one other than Jamie McKelvie, one of my favourite artists.

Most people will know Loki by his MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) version, but the Loki I like the most is - was - Kid Loki. After Loki died in the comics, his brother Thor brought him back to life... as a child. Loki strived to change everyone's opinion of him while he had a chance, but no one would ever believe he wasn't a monster. Eventually he managed to save the world, but at a price... his new found life as a hero.

Kid Loki

The old Loki took over his childlike body, and through schemes and plans, he assembled the Young Avengers, and used the superhero Wiccan's powers to restore him to an older, more powerful body.

New Loki

The designs for new Loki has taken obvious influence from the MCU Loki, probably using the familiarity MCU fans have of him to bring in new readers to the Young Avengers comic and to Loki's new comic in the future (which, of course, I'll be excited about. Unfortunately, Kieron Gillen wouldn't be writing Loki anymore, but I can still give it a try).

New Loki as seen in Young Avengers #11

That's what you get, Loki

MOSI Exhibition - Cosgrove Hall

Manchester Museum of Science and Industry recently held an animation exhibition, focussing on Cosgrove Hall films. The exhibition was smaller than I'd have liked it to be (only a room!) but it was full of storyboards  and scripts and different models and parts of models form their films and TV shows.

The creators of the company, Brian Cosgrove and Mark Hall met at university in Manchester, later becoming co-workers at Manchester College of Art and Design (which is now Manchester Metropolitan University). Hall created his own company - Stop Frame Productions in 1969, with Cosgrove joining shortly after. The company ran for 6 years until 1975, after which the producer of one of the serieses' they made called Rainbow created his own animation studio called Cosgrove Hall Films, comissioning the two as lead animators. The company changed ownership a fir bit until it finally ended up in the hands of ITV.

Some of the companies' most famous work consists of Dangermouse, The Wind in the Willows, Bill and Ben and James and the Giant peach, all things I watched when I was younger. Childrens' shows became one of the studio's specialities, but they also made the BBC's first fully animated webcasts, Ghosts of Albion, and also an animated Doctor Who story made just for the BBC website.

James and the Giant Peach

Bill and Ben models

As ITV began cutting down on franchises, they had a financial review deciding that there was not enough interest in Cosgrove Hall  to invest further, and so the company was shut down. In 2011, Cosgrove Hall Fitzpatrick Entertainment was formed with the help of an intellectual property lawyer, Francis Fitzpatrick. Mark Hall died later that year, and his son took his place working alongside Brian Cosgrove.
Notable other people having worked at Cosgrove Hall include Ian MacKinnon and Peter Saunders (MacKinnon&Saunders) and John Squire (Stone Roses)

Pokemon: Evolution of Graphics

Pokemon X and Y launched on the 12th of October, and after a few weeks of waiting, I finally have my hands on my own copy. I've played Pokemon games for over half of my life, and one of my favorite things about a new game is seeing the change in graphics and style.
   The new game is made for the 3DS, which means there's an even bigger jump in style this time. In this post, I'm going to explore the change from 1995, the first games, to 2013, with the newest ones.



Pokemon Red, Blue and Yellow were the first games in the franchise, for the Gameboy Colour. The colours in the actual game were limited (ironically), showing more colour in Pokemon battles than in the actual world where your character walked around. Everything was extremely square, with a low resolution screen and limited space. Backgrounds weren't even apart of Pokemon battles, instead keeping them simple to concentrate on the gameplay rather than the visuals.



 Pokemon Gold, Silver and Crystal in 1999 didn't have a huge change in graphics compared to the newer ones, but both Pokemon and the main world had a lot more color. It was a lot more interesting visually, and environment designs looked a lot more interesting, even if they were still stuck with too many square shapes.




Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald (2004) had a huge jump in graphics. It was the first Pokemon game for the new Gameboy Advanced - and the GBA SP which featured a backlight, something that was much needed for the older games. Everything has bright color that fits nicely with the environment, and even the battles have patterns and colors for their background, depending on what location you are in. Though still very square and blocky for the most part, there are a lot more interesting shapes that make certain parts of the environment (i.e trees) seem a lot less stuck together.




The next games out were Pearl, Diamond and Platinum (2009), and Soul Silver and Heart Gold, in 210, both of which had very similar designs. Above is Heart Gold/Soul Silver gameplay, picked just from personal preference. Environments have again improved, a lot more realistic and shaped than before. There's a wider range of colors, and shading isn't as plain now - the game uses a pseudo-3D style of rendering to make things like the trees much more realistic.The next couple of games, Pokemon Black and White used largely the same style.




Pokemon X and Y are the newest games of the series, released in 2013 for the 3DS, which changed the graphics drastically. Rather than the typical frame-by-frame animation of the earlier 2D games, small 3D models are used instead of sprites, including those of Pokemon in the actual battles - with the 3D switch on, you can watch the battle in 3D without any glasses if you can manage to hold the console extremely still, and not get a headache or any queasiness from it. Though I don't particularly like the actual 3D mode you can put it on, the 3D animation inside the actual game looks good. It's so far from Pokemon Yellow that it barely feels like the same franchise, but the games style every new generation has led into this style smoothly enough, and I think it is a good change, especially with a wider target audience - there's no worry of keeping the game in the Pokemon 'style' anymore - the older games are already considered as retro, and this new style is accepted a lot more among newer viewers.